. 2011 Jun 16;6(6):e20740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020740

Table 1. Characteristics of the UCB units after EloHAES separation and cryopreservation.

	Collected UCB		Volume reduced UCB		Thawed UCB
	Volume	NCs	NCs	CD34⁺ cells	NCs	CD34⁺ cells	Recovery CD34⁺ cells
	ml	x10⁶	x10⁶	x10⁶	x10⁶	x10⁶	%
Donor 1	88	1294	790	3.90	368	2.96	76
Donor 2	151	1857	1312	5.88	469	3.73	63
Donor 3	141	1734	1378	4.96	653	3.23	65
Donor 4	87	1992	1588	8.72	819	8.12	93
Donor 5	119	1821	1106	3.68	583	2.28	62
Donor 6	153	1775	1519	3.17	829	2.15	68
Donor 7	152	1733	978	2.08	440	2.06	99
Donor 8	72	1210	760	2.70	403	2.07	77
Donor 9	78	772	600	3.96	248	1.84	46
Donor 10	97	927	616	1.73	386	1.69	98
Donor 11	81	1207	974	2.82	479	2.52	89
Donor 12	175	2380	1721	6.90	943	3.96	57
Donor 13	95	1430	1008	3.04	558	2.66	87
Donor 14	77	857	680	1.75	273	1.43	82
Donor 15	88	1223	969	2.40	563	2.14	89
Donor 16	130	1829	1364	2.78	821	1.82	66
mean	111	1503	1085	3.78	552	2.79	76
SD	34	455	357	1.95	210	1.59	16
median	96	1581	993	3.11	518	2.21	76
min	72	772	600	1.73	248	1.43	46
max	175	2380	1721	8.72	943	8.12	99

The table summarizes the processing of 16 UCB units used for CD34⁺ enrichment after collection, volume reduction and thawing process. Nucleated cells (NCs) were counted with the AcT10 counter (Beckman coulter). CD34⁺ cells were enumerated by single platform flow cytometry analysis. Results are depicted as mean, standard deviation, median, minimum (min) and maximum (max) volume, number of cells or percentages, respectively.