Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 16;6(6):e20901. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020901

Table 1. Clustering analysis of GO terms for genes upregulated in fkh mutants.

Annotation Clustera Gene Onotology (GO) term Fold enrichment P-value
1 (6.74) Chitin metabolic process 3.6 9.0×10−9
Polysaccharide metabolic process 3.4 1.5×10−10
Aminoglycan metabolic process 3.4 1.4×10−9
Polysaccharide binding 3.0 9.2×10−8
Pattern binding 3.0 9.2×10−8
Chitin binding 3.0 2.7×10−6
Chitin binding protein, peritrophin-A 2.9 1.5×10−5
ChtBD2 2.6 6.8×10−5
Carbohydrate binding 2.4 2.4×10−6
Extracellular region 1.8 3.2×10−7
2 (5.52) Synapse 3.8 8.3×10−6
Cell junction 3.2 1.5×10−5
Cell junction 3.0 9.8×10−8
Synapse 2.9 1.0×10−6
Synapse part 2.8 1.9×10−5
3 (4.90) Structural constituent of cuticle 3.0 1.6×10−7
Structural constituent of chitin-based larval cuticle 2.9 1.1×10−2
Insect cuticle protein 2.8 4.4×10−6
Structural constituent of chitin-based cuticle 2.8 4.4×10−6
Structural molecule activity 1.8 9.1×10−6
4 (4.04) Basement membrane 7.8 1.0×10−4
Extracellular matrix part 7.2 1.8×10−4
Extracellular matrix 4.0 4.2×10−6
Proteinaceous extracellular matrix 4.0 1.0×10−5
Extracellular region part 1.9 7.9×10−3
5 (3.98) Fatty acid biosynthetic process 5.1 2.7×10−5
Lipid synthesis 4.4 8.9×10−3
Fatty acid metabolic process 4.1 9.2×10−6
Organic acid biosynthetic process 3.6 2.1×10−5
Carboxylic acid biosynthetic process 3.6 2.1×10−5
Lipid biosynthetic process 2.3 1.3×10−3
6 (3.60) Plasma membrane part 2.0 3.1×10−8
Integral to plasma membrane 1.6 2.1×10−2
Intrinsic to plasma membrane 1.6 2.5×10−2
7 (3.48) Muscle 13 1.8×10−5
Striated muscle thin filament 13 1.4×10−4
Contractile fiber 10 3.3×10−12
Sarcomere 9.8 1.0×10−8
Contractile fiber part 9.7 3.1×10−10
Muscle protein 9.4 2.4×10−9
Myofibril 9.2 2.5×10−8
Myofibril assembly 7.2 2.0×10−4
Skeletal muscle tissue development 3.7 2.2×10−3
Skeletal muscle organ development 3.3 4.2×10−4
Striated muscle tissue development 3.3 5.3×10−3
Striated muscle cell development 3.2 3.1×10−3
Muscle cell development 3.2 3.1×10−3
Muscle tissue development 3.2 6.2×10−3
Striated muscle cell differentiation 3.1 4.1×10−4
Muscle cell differentiation 2.9 4.6×10−4
Actomyosin structure organization 2.7 4.4×10−2
Actin cytoskeleton 2.3 4.6×10−3
Muscle organ development 2.1 3.4×10−3
8 (3.00) Domain: EF-hand 3 6.6 2.0×10−5
Domain: EF-hand 4 6.1 1.8×10−3
Domain: EF-hand 1 4.9 9.0×10−5
Domain: EF-hand 2 4.9 9.0×10−5
Calcium-binding region 1 4.8 7.8×10−4
Calcium-binding region 2 4.8 7.8×10−4
EF hand 4.8 1.6×10−2
Signal transduction mechanisms / Cytoskeleton / Cell division and chromosome partitioning / General function prediction only 3.3 1.5×10−2
Calcium 2.4 1.9×10−5
Calcium ion binding 2.3 4.1×10−7
EF-Hand 1 2.1 3.2×10−3
EF-Hand type 2.1 3.7×10−3
Calcium-binding EF-hand 2.1 2.2×10−2
EF hand 2.1 2.2×10−2
EF-Hand 2 2.0 1.1×10−2
EFh 1.8 4.5×10−2

David analysis reveals a significant enrichment of eight annotation clusters (based on Gene Ontology terms) in the set of genes upregulated in stage 11 fkh mutant embryos. Shown are all clusters with enrichment scores ≥3.00

a

The enrichment score is shown in parentheses. P<0.05.