Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2011 Jun 1;15(2):101–110. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2010.515984

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Percentage of total cadaver femur training set variance explained by statistical shape and density model (SSDM) eigenmodes. Nearly 80% of the total variance in proximal femur shape and bone density distribution can be explained by three independent shape and density model eigenmodes. 100% of the variance in the training set is explained by 6 eigenodes.