Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 8.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer. 2010 Nov 8;117(7):10.1002/cncr.25589. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25589

Table 3.

The Association Between Socioeconomic Status and Mammographic Screening Prior to Diagnosis and Stage of Disease at Diagnosis Among 5,820 Breast Cancer Cases, Wisconsin, 1995–2003.

Annual screening
mammograma
Local stage at
diagnosis
Regional stage at
diagnosis
Distant stage at
diagnosis
Characteristic OR (95% CI)b OR (95% CI)b OR (95% CI)b OR (95% CI)b
Individual-level variables
Education
  College degree 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref)
  Some college 0.79 (0.64, 0.98) 1.05 (0.90, 1.23) 0.95 (0.81, 1.11) 0.99 (0.58, 1.68)
  No collegec 0.66 (0.55, 0.79) 0.97 (0.84, 1.12) 1.03 (0.89, 1.19) 1.03 (0.64, 1.66)
Income-to-poverty ratio
  ≥5.0 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref)
  2.5–5.0 0.72 (0.59, 0.88) 0.86 (0.74, 1.01) 1.12 (0.95, 1.31) 1.73 (0.86, 3.48)
  <2.5 0.49 (0.39, 0.61) 0.85 (0.70, 1.03) 1.11 (0.92, 1.35) 2.06 (1.03, 4.11)
Community-level variables
% without a high school diploma
  0–9.9 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref)
  10.0–19.9 0.80 (0.68, 0.93) 0.97 (0.86, 1.11) 1.00 (0.88, 1.14) 1.41 (0.88, 2.25)
  ≥20 0.77 (0.61, 0.97) 0.95 (0.79, 1.14) 0.99 (0.82, 1.20) 2.00 (1.11, 3.60)
% in poverty
  0–4.9 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref)
  5–9.9 0.85 (0.73, 0.99) 0.99 (0.87, 1.12) 1.02 (0.90, 1.15) 0.94 (0.61, 1.46)
  ≥10 0.75 (0.61, 0.92) 0.89 (0.76, 1.05) 1.08 (0.91, 1.27) 1.53 (0.93, 2.53)

Bolded estimates are statistically significant at P < 0.05.

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

a

Limited to women age 50 or older.

b

Adjusted for age and year of diagnosis.

c

Includes 277 women without a high school diploma and 2,451 women with a high school diploma.