Table 3.
Internal relations between relevance and judgments subscales.
| MFQ relevance subscales: | |||||
| MFQ judgments subscales: | Harm | Fairness | Ingroup | Authority | Purity |
| Harm | .47 | .36 | .03 | .04 | .10 |
| Fairness | .32 | .46 | −.09 | −.11 | −.12 |
| Ingroup | −.05 | −.13 | .48 | .43 | .40 |
| Authority | −.12 | −.21 | .42 | .49 | .47 |
| Purity | .05 | −.09 | .44 | .53 | .74 |
| After partialing political ideology: | |||||
| MFQ relevance subscales: | |||||
| MFQ judgments subscales: | Harm | Fairness | Ingroup | Authority | Purity |
| Harm | .38 | .25 | .07 | .09 | .19 |
| Fairness | .23 | .35 | .06 | .05 | .07 |
| Ingroup | .04 | −.04 | .38 | .32 | .25 |
| Authority | −.02 | −.08 | .31 | .39 | .31 |
| Purity | .11 | −.01 | .29 | .37 | .64 |
Note. Top panel shows zero-order correlations between subscales; bottom panel shows partial correlations after removing variance shared with political ideology. The highest correlation in each row is shown in bold.