Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Aug;101(2):366–385. doi: 10.1037/a0021847

Table 5.

Goodness-of-fit indices for structural models representing confirmatory factor analyses of Moral Foundations Questionnaire data collected on yourmorals.org (N=34,476)

Relevance items χ2 df εa Δχ2/Δdf 95%CI εaΔ
[1] Single factor 57093.3 90 .100
[2] Two correlated factors 20180.0 89 .060 36913.3/1 1.024 – 1.045
[3] Three correlated factors 17658.0 87 .057 2522.0/2 0.184 – 0.199
[4] Five correlated factors 11347.5 80 .047 6310.5/7 0.158 – 0.166

Judgment items χ2 df εa Δχ2/Δdf 95%CI εaΔ

[1] Single factor 32485.5 90 .076
[2] Two correlated factors 17270.0 89 .055 15215.5/1 0.654 – 0.675
[3] Three correlated factors 12191.4 87 .047 5078.6/2 0.264 – 0.279
[4] Five correlated factors 11084.6 80 .047 1106.8/7 0.064 – 0.072

Full MFQ (all items) χ2 df εa Δχ2/Δdf 95%CI εaΔ

[1] Single factor 138995.4 405 .073
[2] Two correlated factors 74542.9 404 .054 64452.5/1 1.357 – 1.378
[3] Three correlated factors 63074.0 402 .050 11468.9/2 0.400 – 0.415
[4] Five correlated factors 53894.1 395 .046 9179.9/7 0.191 – 0.199

Note. εa = root-mean-square error of approximation (RMSEA) for the model. Δχ2/Δdf = change in χ² and degrees of freedom relative to the previous model. 95%CI εaΔ = confidence interval around RMSEA of the change in fit between models; if .050 falls within the CI, then model fits are not considered significantly different. Model in bold is the best-fitting model according to these comparisons.