Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addict Biol. 2010 Dec 23;17(3):648–658. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2010.00270.x

Table 2.

Autonomic parameters for drug-free comparison subjects (n = 21) and participants with a history of METH dependence (n = 17) during the 5 minute rest period. SampEn tolerance level r for determining RR sequence matches was set at 10% (0.1) of the standard deviation of the data set. Data are represented as means ± S.E.M. Asterisks indicate significant group differences

Parameter Comparison METH-Dependent Effect Size (r)
Time Domain

HR (beats/min) 64.0 ± 2.1 70.8 ± 2.4 0.32
SDNN (ms) 69.5 ± 6.9 56.0 ± 5.7 0.23
RMSSD (ms) 54.6 ± 8.3 31.0 ± 4.3* 0.37
pNN50 (%) 0.28 ± 0.05 0.09 ± 0.03* 0.39
Frequency Domain

HFn 0.40 ± 0.04 0.21 ± 0.03** 0.51
LFn 0.53 ± 0.04 0.65 ± 0.03* 0.36
LF/HF ratio 2.0 ± 0.36 4.10 ± 0.64** 0.46
Nonlinear Analysis

entropy h 0.35 ± 0.01 0.30 ± 0.01** 0.46
SampEn (m = 1) 0.21 ± 0.05 0.09 ± 0.03 0.30
SampEn (m = 2) 0.19 ± 0.04 0.09 ± 0.02* 0.31
SampEn (m = 3) 0.16 ± 0.04 0.08 ± 0.02 0.31
*

p < 0.05

**

p < 0.01.

indicates a trend towards a group effect (p < 0.1).