Skip to main content
. 2011 May 5;5:61. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-5-61

Table 1.

The best results found for q = 2.5 compared with q = 1.0.

(a) ER network model
q k TP FP FN TN

1 1 223 229 21 9735
2.5 229 105 15 9741

1 2 311 162 27 9635
2.5 320 50 18 9644

1 3 344 131 36 9584
2.5 362 17 18 9602

1 4 381 96 46 9527
2.5 397 15 30 9543

1 5 383 96 91 9435
2.5 401 11 73 9453

(b) BA network model

q k TP FP FN TN

1 1 168 285 47 9738
2.5 175 149 40 9745

1 2 251 212 30 9689
2.5 259 83 22 9697

1 3 304 156 55 9586
2.5 314 37 45 9596

1 4 348 125 102 9448
2.5 356 21 94 9456

1 5 360 110 117 9406
2.5 383 16 94 9429

The best results found for q = 2.5 compared with q = 1.0 by considering each gene individually in the same network: (a) uniformly-random Erdös-Rényi model (ER) and (b) scale-free Barabási-Albert network topology (BA).