Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 17;6(6):e20592. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020592

Table 2. A comparison of the jackknife success rates by Gnec-mPLoc [11] and the current iLoc-Gneg on the benchmark dataset Inline graphic (cf. Supporting Information S1) that covers 8 location sites of Gram-negative bacterial proteins in which none of the proteins included has Inline graphic25% pairwise sequence identity to any other in a same location.

Code Subcellular location Success rate by jackknife test
Gneg-mPLoca iLoc-Gnegb
1 Cell inner membrane 525/557 = 94.3% 539/557 = 96.8%
2 Cell outer membrane 105/124 = 84.7% 103/124 = 83.1%
3 Cytoplasm 357/410 = 87.1% 367/410 = 89.5%
4 Extracellular 79/133 = 59.4% 115/133 = 86.5%
5 Fimbrium 28/32 = 87.5% 30/32 = 93.8%
6 Flagellum 0/12 = 0.0% 12/12 = 100%
7 Nucleoid 0/8 = 0.0% 4/8 = 50%
8 Periplasm 154/180 = 85.6% 161/180 = 89.4%
Overallc 1248/1456 = 85.7% 1331/1456 = 91.4%
a

The predictor from [11].

b

The predictor proposed in this paper.

c

Note that instead of 1,392 (the number of total different Gram-positive bacterial proteins), here we use 1,456 (the number of total different locative proteins) for the denominator. This is because some of the Gram-negative bacterial proteins in Inline graphic may have more than one location site. See footnotes a and b of Table 1 for further explanation.