Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 15.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2011 May 10;17(12):3969–3983. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-3347

Figure 6. Blockade of IL-6R signaling does not prevent iTreg reversion but increases Thy1.2+ cell numbers.

Figure 6

(A-C) Lethally irradiated Balb/c mice were transplanted with B6.PL BM, B6.PL spleen cells (adjusted to yield 0.6 × 106 αβ T cells) and 0.6 × 106 B6 in vitro-differentiated iTregs. Mice were then administered anti-IL-6R (n=11) or isotype control (n=9) antibody on days 0 and 7 as described in Methods. Data are cumulative results of three experiments. (A) Representative dot plots gated on CD4+ T cells showing the percentage of Thy1.2+ cells that expressed EGFP in spleen, liver, lung, and colon samples 10 days after transplantation. (B) Absolute number of CD4+ Thy1.2+ EGFP+ and EGFP cells in the specified tissue sites from animals treated with isotype (black bars) or anti-IL-6R antibody (white bars). (C) Percentage of CD4+ Thy1.2+ EGFP cells that secreted IFN-γ in each tissue. (D) Representative histograms showing IL-6R expression on naïve CD4+ T cells (solid line) and in vitro-differentiated iTregs (dashed line) prior to transplantation. Isotype control is in gray. (E). IL-6R expression on iTregs obtained from the spleen of mice ten days post transplantation. Isotype control is in gray. Statistics: * p<0.05, **p<0.01.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure