Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Hepatol. 2010 Nov 23;55(1):76–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.10.033

Table 4.

Adjusted models of predictors of PEG-IFN 80/80 adherence and completion of 24 weeks of PEG-IFN treatment among the overall (n=109) and HCV mono-infected population (n=74) treated for recently acquired HCV infection

Adjusted
OR
95% CI P P-
overall
PEG-IFN 80/80 adherence
Overall population (n=109)a
Tertiary education or greater
 Yes 1.00 - - - -
 No 0.24 0.08 0.79 0.018 -
Accommodation
 Rent - - - - -
 Privately owned - - - - -
 Unstable - - - - -
HCV mono-infected population (n=74)b
Tertiary education or greater
 Yes 1.00 - - - -
 No 0.32 0.08 1.23 0.096 -
Accommodation
 Rent - - - - -
 Privately owned - - - - -
 Unstable - - - - -
Completion of 24 weeks of PEG-IFN treatment
Overall population (n=109)c
Tertiary education or greater
 Yes 1.00 - - - -
 No 0.31 0.11 0.81 0.017 -
Accommodation
 Rent 1.00 - - - -
 Privately owned 4.32 1.15 16.19 0.030 0.003
 Unstable 0.22 0.06 0.84 0.027 -
HCV mono-infected population (n=74)d
Tertiary education or greater
 Yes - - - - -
 No - - - - -
Accommodation
 Rent 1.00 - - - -
 Privately owned 3.35 0.67 16.72 0.140 0.003
 Unstable 0.14 0.03 0.60 0.008 -
a

Nagelkerkes R-square=0.096, classification rate=82%;

b

Nagelkerkes R-square=0.065, classification rate=77%;

c

Nagelkerkes R-square=0.268, classification rate=74%;

d

Nagelkerkes R-square=0.283, classification rate=76%.