Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Mar 16;204(6):545.e1–545.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.01.063

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Figure 3

A) Analysis of errors made during simple discrimination (SD) 1–5 tasks revealed a sex effect with the Female Control (open bars, n=7) making more errors than the Male Control (small squares, n=6) offspring during SD2 (p≤0.05, #). Female βM exposed (closed bars, n=7) and Male βM exposed (big squares, n=5). Mean ± SEM.

B) Analysis of errors made during simple discriminations (SD) followed by reversals (SR) revealed a treatment effect with the Female βM exposed offspring (closed bars, n=7) making more errors than the Female Control (open bars, n=7) during SR2 (p<0.05, *) and a sex effect as compared to the Male βM exposed offspring (big squares, n=5) during SR1 and SR2 (p<0.05, #), and SR3 (p=0.07, †). Male Control (small squares, n=6). Mean ± SEM.