Skip to main content
. 2011 May 18;10:54. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-10-54

Table 3.

Endogenous DNA damage and DNA repair activity in lymphocytes, before and after kiwifruit intervention; Arbitrary units (n = 24)

Fruits Before After Diff Differ (%) p
Mean SEM Mean SEM Mean SEM
FPG-sensitive sites 1 196.38 73.7 130.33 85.3 -66.05 112.7 -34 0.01
2 188.58 61.5 148.26 106.7 -40.32 123.2 -21 0.12
Endonuclease III-sensitive sites1 1 139.42 71.1 104.00 59.8 -35.42 92.9 -25 0.20
2 138.17 41.2 92.25 62.1 -45.92 74.5 -33 0.04
Resistance towards H2O2 oxidation 1 283.08 43.9 189.25 117.2 -93.83 125.2 -33 0.00
2 278.00 51.6 191.52 124.5 -86.48 134.8 -31 0.00
Base exision repair (BER) 1 48.43 16.3 46.61 14.5 -1.82 21.8 -4 0.69
2 52.54 13.8 49.11 15.1 -3.43 20.5 -7 0.43
Nucleotide excision repair (NER)2 1 39.38 21.3 38.13 23.9 -1.25 32.0 -3 0.85
2 37.71 18.8 35.50 23.3 -2.21 29.9 -6 0.72

SEM: standard error of the mean. 1Based on samples exclusively from the second intervention period (n = 12). 2n = 23.