Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 10.
Published in final edited form as: Vision Res. 2011 Feb 16;51(9):978–986. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.02.011

Figure 4.

Figure 4

zDiff scores for ambiguous trials on Day 2. Data points for individual subjects are overlaid with means and standard errors of the mean. Outcomes are assessed relative to Day 1 contingency. a. Subjects viewed the disparity-plus-occlusion cue set on Day 2; two groups of 8 subjects. b. Subject viewed the monocular-only cue set on Day 2; two groups of 8 subjects. It can be seen that the two graphs are highly similar, indicating that the cue-set used for counter-conditioning on Day 2 did not affect the retained bias; Day 1 conditioning using the monocular-only cue set established a greater perceptual bias than did the disparity-plus-occlusion cue set.