Skip to main content
. 2011 Apr 14;8(4):1110–1125. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8041110

Table 3.

Results of logistic regression models on respiratory symptoms of students * (n = 667).

Dependent variables with only significant risk factors (p < 0.05) Model coefficient (B) Standard error Statistical significance (p) Odds Ratio (95%CI: lower-upper)
Physician diagnosed chronic pulmonary disease
Industrial zone (ref = school 3 ) 0.396 0.150 0.008 1.49 (1.11–1.99)
In family asthma, allergy etc (ref = no ) 0.927 0.239 0.0001 2.53 (1.58–4.04)
Gender (ref = female) 0.569 0.260 0.029 1.77 (1.06–2.94)

Wheezing
In family asthma, allergy etc (ref = no ) 0.547 0.240 0.022 1.73 (1.08–2.76)
Mother’s job (ref = housewife) –0.999 0.321 0.002 0.37 (1.01–3.16)
Smoking (ref = no) 0.521 0.208 0.012 1.68 (1.12–2.53)

Physician –diagnosed current asthma
In family asthma, allergy etc. (ref = no ) 1.344 0.465 0.004 3.80 (1.53–9.45)
Working status of student (ref = no ) 2.168 0.721 0.003 8.74 (2.13–35.92)

Tightness in the chest
Industrial zone (ref = school 3 ) 0.450 0.130 0.001 1.57 (1.22–2.02)

Physician –diagnosed bronchitis
Passive smoker (ref = no ) 0.465 0.188 0.013 1.59 (1.10–2.30)

Persistent cough with phlegm
Father’s job (ref = retired) 0.586 0.213 0.006 1.79 (1.18–2.72)

Morning cough without infection
Industrial zone (ref = school 3 ) 0.592 0.215 0.006 1.81 (1.19–2.75)
Mother’s education (ref = middle school) –0.650 0.281 0.021 0.52 (0.30–0.90)

Morning phlegm without infection
Smoking (ref = no) 0.581 0.235 0.014 1.79 (1.13–2.83)

ref = reference;

* = All the independent variables in Table 1 and school zones were included in the models.