Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 10.
Published in final edited form as: Vision Res. 2011 Feb 26;51(9):1086–1098. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.02.022

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Experiment 2: Effects of exogenous attention on performance (d′) as a function of 2nd-order modulator contrast for the two low 2nd-order modulator spatial frequency texture conditions at 10 deg eccentricity (A: LL; B: HL). Both panels plot psychometric functions and parameter estimates (c50 and dmax) for each cueing condition (valid, neutral and invalid). Plotting conventions as in Fig. 4.