Table 3.
DIO-AL, n = 7 | DIO-WR, n = 8 | CON-AL, n = 8 | CON-WR, n = 8 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Leptin, ng/ml | 121.7 ± 14.9a | 25.1 ± 2.9b | 14.0 ± 3.6b* | 9.0 ± 1.3b* |
Insulin, μg/l | 3.7 ± 0.7a | 1.6 ± 0.2b | 1.2 ± 0.2b | 0.6 ± 0.1b |
Glucose, mg/dl | 125 ± 3a | 105 ± 3b | 110 ± 3b | 94 ± 2c |
T3, ng/dl | 31.6 ± 5.3a | 16.8 ± 1.8b | 31.8 ± 8.1a | 15.7 ± 4.4b |
T4, ng/ml | 45.8 ± 4 | 49.9 ± 2 | 46.1 ± 2.2 | 50.6 ± 2.6 |
TSH, ng/ml | 283.1 ± 30.5 | 252.8 ± 35.5 | 221.7 ± 52.7 | 226.8 ± 42.6 |
HOMA2 S | 10.1 ± 1.2a | 24.3 ± 4.3ab | 30.6 ± 4.5b | 60.2 ± 11.2c |
HOMA2 IR | 11.1 ± 1.8a | 4.9 ± 0.7b | 3.8 ± 0.6bc | 2.0 ± 0.3c |
Data are means ± SE. T3, triiodothyronine; T4, thyroxine; TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone; HOMA S, HOMA insulin sensitivity; HOMA IR, HOMA insulin resistance. Data not marked by the same letter are significantly different by 2-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc analysis.
Student's t-test comparisons of CON-AL and CON-WR against DIO-WR.