Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Mem Lang. 2011 Jul;65(1):42–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.03.002

Table 5.

Summary of interactions of skill measures by lexical properties of words N and N−1 as predictors of eye-movement durations, obtained via mediation analysis (Appendix 3). All reported interactions are significant at the 0.05-level. Directions of coefficients for all reported interaction terms were identical within each type of interaction and are reported in parentheses.

1. Eye-movement
measures
2. Test scores by word N
length
3. Test scores by residual word N
frequency (all +)
FirstFixPos span, piatr,wid (+) span, wid, piatr
  FirstFixDur wid, piatl, phonrev rln, rdn, wid
  SingleFixDur wid, piatr, piatl (−) rln, rdn, wid
  GazeDur wid, piatl, piatr (−) wid, rln, piatr
RegrPathTime wid, rdn, rln (−) rdn, rln, wid
  SecPassTime wid, rdn, digmem (−) -
  TotalTime wid, digmem, nwrep (−) nwrep, rln, digmem