Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Child Neuropsychol. 2011 Jul;17(4):368–390. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2010.544649

Table 1.

Linear regression analyses for baseline EF variables and adolescent social functioning

β R2 Change Sig. β R2 Change Sig.
Response Inhibition (RI)
Step 1: Group −.600 .360 .000** Step 1: Subgroup −.606 .367 .000**
Step 2: RI −.158 .025 .022* Step 2: RI −.097 .005 .161
Step 3: Group x RI −.067 .002 .536 Step 3: Subgroup x RI .016 −.005 .875

Planning
Step 1: Group −.582 .339 .000** Step 1: Subgroup −.584 .341 .000**
Step 2: Planning −.150 .021 .038* Step 2: Planning −.133 .016 .068
Step 3: Group x Planning −.186 .010 .130 Step 3: Subgroup x Planning −.126 .001 .276

Working Memory (WM)
Step 1: Group −.578 .334 .000** Step 1: Subgroup −.602 .363 .000**
Step 2: WM −.133 .017 .082 Step 2: WM −.136 .017 .069
Step 3: Group x WM .010 .000 .935 Step 3: Subgroup x WM −.049 .001 .649

Fine Motor Control (FMC)
Step 1: Group −.577 .333 .000** Step 1: Subgroup −.583 .340 .000**
Step 2: FMC −.086 .007 .222 Step 2: FMC −.123 .015 .077
Step 3: Group x FMC −.158 .006 .266 Step 3: Subgroup x FMC −.174 .010 .150
*

p < .05.

**

p < .01