Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2011 Feb 24;66(1):40–56. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22775

Table 4.

Visual stimulation data1,2 for the three iVASO methods and conventional VASO.

TR/TI
(ms)
Method Activated
Voxels3
ΔS/S
(%)
SNR tSNR CNR
5000/1054 Seq. I 2731±204 −0.62±0.04 347±8 313±11 6.56±0.51
Seq. IIa 2388±224 −0.66±0.06 308±16 290±10 6.54±0.36
Seq. IIb 2698±220 −0.69±0.04 308±16 287±9 6.96±0.36
VASO 1910±213 −1.46±0.15 104±4 99±10 4.88±0.54
2000/711 Seq. I 2219±183 −0.59±0.06 319±9 283±10 9.09±0.89
Seq. IIa 2286±168 −0.60±0.07 288±8 254±13 8.58±0.80
Seq. IIb 2102±230 −0.59±0.05 302±7 282±6 8.92±0.89
VASO 2252±216 −2.16±0.32 66±3 63±5 7.32±1.07
1000/424 Seq. I 2294±108 −0.47±0.03 227±9 201±11 7.22±0.47
Seq. IIa 2053±211 −0.48±0.03 207±6 188±8 6.74±0.61
Seq. IIb 2210±134 −0.51±0.03 196±6 181±9 7.29±0.42
VASO 893±131 N/A N/A N/A N/A
1

n=7, mean ± standard deviation.

2

All ΔS/S, SNR, tSNR and CNR are averaged over voxels that were activated in all four experiments of the same TR/TI. Therefore, SNR and tSNR reported here is per image per voxel based. CNR is per voxel per minute based.

3

The number of voxels is based on the reconstructed image resolution (256×256).