Policy ideas, narratives and discourse(s) |
Extent to which there is a consensus on the nature of the problem and appropriate responses |
Packaging of research or ‘knowledge translation’ for policy audience – e.g. explicit and clear policy recommendations; short summaries or briefs; using policy ‘language’ such as economic vocabulary, framing of research to resonate with prevailing policy discourses, or tailoring messages to specific policy environments. |
|
|
|
Extent of influence of international discourses on domestic policy |
Research methodologies that develop research user ‘ownership’ throughout the research process. |
|
|
|
Extent to which policy issue is novel |
Explicit, targeted communication and dissemination strategies. |
|
Policy actors and networks |
Extent to which ruling party is ideologically driven |
Interpersonal relationships and networks - Building or connecting to policy networks; policy ‘champions’ and intermediaries and consultations with key policy actors on research during project. |
|
|
|
Extent of ‘special interests’ or range of actors - such as service users, the private sector, unions, or professional associations; or strength of civil society, or influence of donors in policy arena. |
Credibility or ‘brand’ of the originating institution, funder or researcher(s). |
|
|
|
Level of bureaucracy, professionalism and capacity to process evidence. |
Extent of ‘border-crossing’ between research and policy communities |
|
|
|
Importance placed on systematic and other evidence reviews by policy makers in power * |
Utilising knowledge brokers to specifically get research to policy makers |
|
Context and institutions |
Extent of democratic openness; degree of academic and media freedom; norms on consultation and participation in policy processes. |
Planning research to align to specific timing of expected ‘policy windows’ – e.g. research aimed at important meetings of officials/politicians. |
|
|
|
Use of multi-year development plans and other planning instruments |
Planning research to align to ready existing or created ‘policy spaces’ – electoral spaces; consultative spaces; popular protest spaces, etc. |
|
|
|
Level of centralisation of political decision making |
Framing of research around unexpected events – e.g. the financial crisis; need for public expenditure efficiency, etc. |
|
|
|
Established institutional structures and policy advisory bodies which exist to link researchers and policy makers* |
Working creatively with these structures throughout the research cycle |