. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 5.

Published in final edited form as: DNA Repair (Amst). 2011 Mar 22;10(5):497–505. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2011.02.003

Table 3. Replicative polymerase error specificity within the [GT/CA]₁₀ microsatellite.

Microsatellite/ Mutational Events	Proportion of Events (number observed)

	Polδ		Polε

	WT	Exo-	WT	Exo-

[GT]₁₀
Unit-based InDel	0.82 (62)	0.73 (53)	0.96 (53)	0.52 (12)
Deletion	0.82 (62)	0.73 (53)	0.93 (51)	0.52 (12)
1 unit	0.65 (49)	0.49 (36)	0.73 (40)	0.30 (7)
> 1 unit	0.17 (13)	0.23 (17)	0.20 (11)	0.22 (5)

Insertion	0	0	0.04 (2) ^a	0

Interruption	0.18 (14)	0.26 (19)	0.04 (2)	0.48 (11)

[CA]₁₀
Unit-based InDel	1.0 (79)	0.92 (65)	1.0 (49)	0.93 (40)
Deletion	0.92 (73)	0.92 (65)	0.84 (41)	0.84 (36)
1 unit	0.61 (48)	0.66 (47)	0.65 (32)	0.74 (32)
> 1 unit	0.32 (25)	0.25 (18)	0.18 (9)	0.09 (4)

Insertion	0.08 (6)	0	0.16 (8)	0.09 (4)
1 unit	0.05 (4)		0.10 (5)	0.05 (2)
> 1 unit	0.03 (2)		0.06 (3)	0.05 (2)

Interruption	0	0.08 (6)	0	0.07 (3)

All mutants were 1 unit changes

Table 3. Replicative polymerase error specificity within the [GT/CA]10 microsatellite.