Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 6;108(25):10144–10149. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1103735108

Table 1.

Comparison of four genetic models for miR-21

miR-21 genetics Technology Promoter Genetic background* Phenotype Tumor driver gene Changes in cell biology miR-21 Targets Reference
Transgenic tet-off-mediated conditional overexpression nestin promoter (active in multiple organs of adult animals) unknown pre-B lymphoma miR-21 overexpression (> 10-fold) increased cell proliferation; decreased apoptosis ND 16
Transgenic global overexpression cytomegalovirus immediate early enhancer-chicken beta-actin hybrid promoter (CAG, global) B6C3F1 no tumors in major organs miR-21 overexpression (4- to 6-fold) alone did not induce tumorigenesis ND Spry1, Spry2, Btg2 17
B6C3F1x (B6x129) when crossed with KrasLA2 mice, enhances lung tumorigenesis mutant Kras increased cell proliferation; decreased apoptosis; enhanced Ras signaling Spry1, Spry2, Btg2, Pdcd4, and others
Gene targeting conventional knockout NA B6x129 without any gross phenotype; suppresses Kras-driven lung tumorigenesis mutant Kras no change in proliferation, apoptosis, or Ras signaling Spry2
Gene targeting conventional knockout NA B6.129 without any gross phenotype; suppresses chemical-induced skin carcinogenesis; some immune defect when fed with high-fat diet mutant Hras slight reduction in proliferation; increased apoptosis; attenuated Ras signaling Spry1, Pten, Pdcd4, and others this study

Bold indicates the difference between two knockout models.

*B6, C57Bl/6; 129, 129/SvEv; B6C3F1, F1 of c57Bl6 x C3H/HeJ.

ND, not determined; NA, not applicable.