Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 24;342:d3621. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d3621

Table 5.

 Sensitivity and specificity for ambulatory monitoring compared with clinic monitoring of blood pressure

Study Diagnostic thresholds (mm Hg)* Sensitivity % (95% CI) Specificity % (95% CI) Likelihood ratio (95% CI)
Ambulatory Clinic Positive Negative
Brueren 199535 91 (diastolic) 95 (diastolic) 67 (52 to 80) 52 (37 to 67) 1.39 (0.97 to 2.00) 0.64 (0.39 to 1.04)
Brueren 199535 91 (diastolic) 105 (diastolic) 29 (17 to 44) 98 (88 to 100) 13.42 (1.84 to 97.96) 0.72 (0.60 to 0.87)
Denolle199537 139/87 140/90 64 (31 to 89) 0 (0 to 52) 0.64 (0.41 to 1.00) 0
Elijovich 199238 139/88 140/90 89 (78 to 96) 18 (4 to 43) 1.08 (0.85 to 1.37) 0.62 (0.17 to 2.21)
Flores 200039 135/85 140/90 100 (59 to 100) 50 (34 to 66) 2.00 (1.47 to 2.73) 0
Gourlay 199340 135/85 150/90 74 (49 to 91) 87 (74 to 95) 5.77 (2.61 to 12.77) 0.30 (0.14 to 0.65)
Gourlay 199340 135/85 160/95 47 (24 to 71) 94 (82 to 99) 7.42 (2.25 to 24.47) 0.56 (0.37 to 0.87)
Hoegholm 199441 90 (diastolic) 90 (diastolic) 95 (89 to 98) 43 (29 to 57) 1.65 (1.31 to 2.09) 0.12 (0.05 to 0.29)
Imai 199642 133/78 140/90 42 (33 to 51) 88 (84 to 90) 3.36 (2.50 to 4.54) 0.66 (0.57 to 0.77)
Imai 199642 144/85 140/90 58 (42 to 73) 85 (82 to 87) 3.76 (2.76 to 5.14) 0.50 (0.35 to 0.71)
Imai 199642 133/78 160/95 17 (11 to 24) 98 (96 to 99) 7.74 (3.93 to 15.23) 0.85 (0.79 to 0.92)
Imai 199642 144/85 160/95 33 (19 to 49) 97 (95 to 98) 10.43 (5.67 to 19.19) 0.70 (0.57 to 0.86)
Larkin 199843 140/90 140/90 52 (31 to 72) 78 (62 to 89) 2.31 (1.16 to 4.60) 0.62 (0.40 to 0.96)
Larkin 199843 135/85 140/90 50 (33 to 67) 86 (68 to 96) 3.63 (1.38 to 9.53) 0.58 (0.41 to 0.83)
Larkin 199843 See notes* 140/90 53 (35 to 71) 85 (68 to 95) 3.51 (1.47 to 8.37) 0.55 (0.37 to 0.82)
Modesti 199445 See notes* 90 (diastolic) 80 (56 to 94) 84 (76 to 90) 5.01 (3.14 to 7.99) 0.24 (0.10 to 0.57)
Ogedegbe 200846 135/85 140/90 68 (59 to 76) 81 (72 to 88) 3.55 (2.35 to 5.36) 0.40 (0.31 to 0.52)
Ozdemir 200047 See notes* 140/90 80 (61 to 92) 86 (78 to 93) 5.91 (3.46 to 10.10) 0.23 (0.11 to 0.48)
Shimbo 200948 135/85 140/90 57 (48 to 65) 91 (83 to 96) 6.12 (3.23 to 11.61) 0.48 (0.39 to 0.59)
Stergiou 200049 140/90 140/90 86 (76 to 92) 54 (39 to 68) 1.86 (1.36 to 2.54) 0.27 (0.15 to 0.48)
Stergiou 200049 135/85 140/90 81 (72 to 88) 63 (44 to 79) 2.17 (1.37 to 3.42) 0.30 (0.19 to 0.49)
Stergiou 200550 135/85 140/90 86 (80 to 90) 45 (32 to 58) 1.56 (1.23 to 1.97) 0.32 (0.21 to 0.49)
Trudel 200951 135/85 140/90 38 (34 to 42) 98 (97 to 99) 21.46 (14.99 to 30.72) 0.63 (0.59 to 0.67)
Ungar 200452 135/85 140/90 89 (84 to 92) 35 (25 to 45) 1.35 (1.17 to 1.57) 0.33 (0.22 to 0.50)
Zabludowski 199253 90 (diastolic) 90 (diastolic) 81 (71 to 89) 47 (36 to 57) 1.53 (1.23 to 1.90) 0.40 (0.24 to 0.66)

*Modesti45 used 95% confidence limit of controls (clinic normotension) for day (84 mm Hg) diastolic values. Larkin43 used 143/91 (day), 139/87 (24 h), 127/79 (night time). Ozdemir47 used ambulatory threshold 140/90 (waking) and 120/80 (sleeping) if % of raised readings exceeded 20%.