Table 4.
Summary of published clinical mouthrinse efficacy studies used for comparison with in vitro results
| Clinical scorea |
Concn (%) | No. of subjects | Duration (days) | Endpoint(s)b | RPIc | Reference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHX | CPC | SLS | TRN | ||||||
| 2 | 0.2 | 15 | 4 | PI, PA | 0.50 | 21 | |||
| 1 | 0.25 | 0.920.96 | |||||||
| 0 | 0.06 | ||||||||
| 1 | 1.5 | 11 | 4 | PI | 0.49 | 37 | |||
| 0 | 0.3 | 0.33 | |||||||
| 0 | 0.15 | 0.35 | |||||||
| 2 | 0.05 | 20 | 4 | PI, PA | 0.80 | 9 | |||
| 2 | 0.1 | 0.75 | |||||||
| 2 | 0.05 | 0.81 | |||||||
| 1 | 0.05 | 0.94 | |||||||
| 2 | 0.01 | 26 | 4 | PI, PA | 0.89 | 10 | |||
| 2 | 0.05 | 0.67 | |||||||
| 2 | 0.1 | 0.64 | |||||||
| 2 | 0.2 | 0.55 | |||||||
| 1 | 0.2 | 0.93 | |||||||
| 2 | 0.2 | 12 | 4 | PI | 0.11 | 12 | |||
| 1 | 0.3 | 0.23 | |||||||
| 1 | 0.15 | 0.52 | |||||||
| 1 | 0.075 | 0.58 | |||||||
| 2 | 0.12 | 20 | 4 | PI, PA | 0.63 | 27 | |||
| 1 | 0.05 | 0.83 | |||||||
| 1 | 0.03 | 0.86 | |||||||
| 2 | 0.2 | 76 | 35 | PI, BOP, MGI | 0.00 | 42 | |||
| 1 | 0.05 | 0.47 | |||||||
| 1 | 0.3 | 0.61 | |||||||
| 2 | 0.12 | 298 | 157 | PI, GI | 0.69 | 33 | |||
| 1 | 0.1 | 0.81 | |||||||
| 1 | 0.075 | 0.83 | |||||||
| 2 | 0.12 | 16 | 4 | PI | 0.88 | 39 | |||
| 0 | 0.3 | 0.98 | |||||||
| 2 | 0.2 | 15 | 4 | PI | 0.35 | 23 | |||
| 2 | 0.12 | 0.46 | |||||||
| 0 | 0.05 | 0.93 | |||||||
| 1 | 0.03 | 0.77 | |||||||
See Materials and Methods for an explanation of the clinical score.
PI, plaque index; PA, plaque area; BOP, bleeding on probing; MGI, modified gingival index; GI, gingival index; VAB, viable anaerobic bacteria.
RPI, relative plaque index. The RPI is the PI value measured for a treatment divided by the PI value of the corresponding control.