Skip to main content
. 2011 May;49(5):1799–1809. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02350-10

Table 2.

Comparison of 16SpathDB and other commonly used software for bacterial identification using 16S rRNA gene sequencing

Software Yr of first description Company/organization Website Partial/full 16S rRNA gene sequence included Database size Source of sequences Cost Quality control Updates
Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) 1992 Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/ Partial and full 1,418,497 (release 10.22) GenBank No Partial Periodically
MicroSeq Microbial Identification Systema 1998 Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California http://www.microseq.com Partial and fulla 1,834 and 1,261 in the two databases, respectivelya Sequence of 16S rRNA gene of one strain from each species Yes All type strains from culture collections Periodically
Ribosomal Differentiation of Medical Microorganisms (RIDOM) 1999 Ridom GmbH, Würzburg, Germany http://rdna2.ridom.de/ Partial 236b Sequences of 16S rRNA genes of medically relevant bacteria, mainly belonging to the Neisseriaceae, Moraxellaceae, and genus Mycobacterium No All strains from culture collections Periodically
SmartGene IDNS software 2006 SmartGene GmbH, Switzerland http://www.smartgene.com/mod_bacteria.html Partial and full 243,000 GenBank Yes Partial Daily
16SpathDB 2010 Department of Microbiology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong http://147.8.74.24/16SpathDB Partial and full 1,010 GenBank No All sequences manually selected from GenBank Periodically
a

Contains two databases, MicroSeq ID 16S rDNA 500 Library v2.2, which contains sequences from the 5′-end 527 bp of 16S rRNA genes, and MicroSeq ID 16S rDNA Full Gene Library v2.0, which contains full 16S rRNA gene sequences.

b

Number from from http://rdna2.ridom.de/ridom2/servlet/link?page = list (8 Nov 2010).