Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun;49(6):2239–2242. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02566-10

Table 3.

Summary of published studies on detection of CRE from rectal swabs

Design (n) Method evaluateda Results (%)b Reference
Surveillance rectal swabs (187) MAC plate + ERT, IMI, and MER disks; cutoff not stated SN = 87, SP = 100 8
blaKPC qPCR from swabs following extraction method A SN = 100, SP = 95
blaKPC qPCR from swabs following extraction method B SN = 97.9, SP = 96.4
LOD analysis of CRE strains; surveillance rectal swabs (51) TSB + IMI disk, subcultured to MAC plates Comparable analytical LOD, SN = 100 10
TSB, subcultured to MAC plates + IMI disk; cutoff, <16 mm Comparable analytical LOD, SN = 50
Surveillance rectal swabs (149) TSB + IMI disk, subcultured to MAC plates SN = 65.6, SP = 49.6 13
MAC plate + ERT disks; cutoff, <27 mm SN = 97, SP = 90.5
Surveillance rectal swabs (phenotypic methods compared to blaKPC PCR) (122) MAC plate + ERT, IMI, and MER disks; cutoff not stated SN = 92.7, SP = 95.9 21
CHROMagar KPC SN = 100, SP = 98.4
Surveillance rectal swabs (755) Inoculated BHI broth subjected to blaKPC PCR SN = 92.2, SP = 99.4 22
MAC + IMI (1 μg/ml) SN = 87.5, SP = 99.6
Surveillance rectal swabs (139) MAC plate + ERT, IMI, and MER disks; cutoff, <22 mm SN = 75.8, SP = 89.6 Current study
MAC + IMI (1 μg/ml) SN = 84.9, SP = 94.3
CHROMagar KPC SN = 84.9, SP = 88.7
a

TSB, tryptic soy broth; IMI, imipenem; ERT, ertapenem; MER, meropenem; MAC, MacConkey; qPCR, quantitative PCR; BHI, brain heart infusion.

b

SN, sensitivity; SP, specificity.