Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jun 24.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009 Jun;89(3):632–641. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.32015

Figure 3.

Figure 3

MicroCT 2D slice reconstructions of cranial defect scaffolds before implantation. Scaffolds were sintered using three different sphere types. A: Solid 100 μm average diameter spheres. B: Solid 500 μm average diameter spheres. C: Hollow core 500 μm average diameter spheres. D: Sieve ranges for each scaffold group, average sphere diameter within each group measured from macroscope images, % pore volume calculated by microCT, and average pore size calculated by both microCT and mercury porosimetry analysis.