Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hear Res. 2011 Feb 12;277(1-2):127–133. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.02.001

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Representative psychometric functions and response latencies from one subject (Marmoset 4) at three different frequencies. Upper panels show changes in hit rate as a function of stimulus amplitude. Dotted lines show raw hit rates while solid lines show hit rates after a correction for false alarm rate has been applied (see text for a description). Lower panels show concomitant changes in the animal’s latency to lick.