Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2011 Nov;19(11):961–969. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e318211c219

Table 2.

Relation of life space with AD; core model and sensitivity analyses

Model (# incident AD cases / total # subjects) Hazard Ratio 1 (95% CI) χ 21df P value
Model 1: Core model 180 / 1,294 1.21 (1.08—1.36) 10.78 0.001
Model 2: Excluding MCI at baseline 65/ 930 1.29 (1.08—1.54) 8.09 0.004
Model 3: Excluding MCI at baseline and incident AD in 1st year of follow-up 61 / 926 1.29 (1.08—1.56) 7.53 0.006
Model 4: Excluding MCI at baseline and incident AD in 1st or 2nd year of follow-up 48/ 913 1.25 (1.00—1.55) 3.94 0.047
Model 5: Excluding lowest 5% cognitive function at baseline 139 / 1,227 1.28 (1.12—1.45) 13.80 <0.001
Model 6: Excluding lowest 10% cognitive function at baseline 119 / 1,162 1.25 (1.09—1.44) 9.75 0.002
Model 7: Excluding lowest 15% cognitive function at baseline 97 / 1,098 1.28 (1.09—1.49) 9.69 0.002
1

Based on separate Cox proportional hazards models; all models controlled for age, sex, education, and race. Estimates are for a 1 unit change in life space score (higher score = more constricted life space).