Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Heart Rhythm. 2011 Mar 3;8(8):1177–1182. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.02.037

Table 2.

Distribution of LV hypertrophy and LV mass in 191 cases and 203 controls with coronary disease

Cases (n=191) Controls (n=203) p-value*
LVH (%)
    All subjects 48% 25% <0.0001
    Without severe LVSD (123 cases, 165 controls) 42% 21% <0.0001
    With severe LVSD (68 cases, 38 controls) 59% 42% 0.10
Adjusted LVM
    All subjects 129 ± 45 107 ± 36 <0.0001
    Without severe LVSD (123 cases, 165 controls) 120 ± 40 102 ± 32 <0.0001
    With severe LVSD (68 cases, 38 controls) 145 ± 48 128 ± 43 0.07
LVH categories based in adjusted LV mass (%) <0.0001
    No LVH 52% 75%
    0–9% above LVH cut-off 10% 6%
    10–24% above LVH cut-off 15% 9%
    ≥25% above LVH cut-off 23% 9%
Joint Distribution, LVH & LVSD (%) <0.0001
    Neither 37% 65%
    Severe LVSD Only 15% 11%
    LVH Only 27% 17%
    Both LVH and Severe LVSD 21% 8%

LVH: Left Ventricular Hypertrophy defined by quantitative measurements on echocardiogram;

LVSD: Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction assessed by echocardiogram

*

p values from independent samples t-test for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables.

Adjusted LVM calculated as LVM / body surface area.