Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 20;2011:185034. doi: 10.1155/2011/185034

Table 6.

The ability to identify if verum or sham acupuncture was given in subgroups of patients with different characteristics.

Subgroup Stated: Penetrating the skin1 Stated: Placed against the skin1 Not sure at all, guessed Bang's blinding index2 (95% Confidence interval) P value multivariate analysis3
Blinding, by gender n = 190 .760

Verum acupuncture n (%)
 Man n = 18 16 (89) 1 (6) 1 (6) 0.88 (0.66–1.11)
 woman n = 77 58 (75) 5 (6) 14 (18) 0.69 (0.56–0.82)
Sham acupuncture n (%)
 man n = 14 11 (79) 1 (7) 2 (14) −0.71 (1.02–−0.41)*
 woman n = 81 57 (70) 10 (13) 14 (17) −0.58 (−0.73–−0.43)

Blinding, by age n = 190 .357

Verum acupuncture n (%)
 19–40 years old n = 9 8 (89) 0 (0) 1 (11) 0.89 (0.68–1.09)
 41–65 years old n = 40 33 (83) 2 (5) 5 (13) 0.78 (0.61–0.94)
 66–91 years old n = 46 33 (72) 4 (8) 9 (18) 0.63 (0.44–0.81)
Sham acupuncture n (%)
 19–40 years old n = 11 6 (55) 2 (18) 3 (27) −0.36 (−0.82–0.09)
 41–65 years old n = 38 28 (74) 4 (11) 6 (16) −0.63 (−0.84–−0.42)
 66–91 years old n = 46 34 (74) 5 (11) 7 (15) −0.63 (−0.82–−0.44)

1The individuals were fairly or entirely sure of their answer. 2Correct answers/total n—incorrect answers/total n. The number (n) of patients answering the questions is presented. Total n = 190 of the entering 215 patients (18 interrupted radiotherapy and/or verum/sham acupuncture and 7 did not provide blinding data. 3Including the variables seen in Tables 46 and received needling type. *Statistically significant difference between the subgroups.