Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 27;6(6):e21577. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021577

Table 3. Effect of the single point mutations and spx on the emergence of teicoplanin resistance.

No. bacteria under non-selective conditions T0 No. bacteria under selective conditions T2 Frequency of emergence1
Strain Relevant genotype Mean (n = 7) SEM Mean (n = 7) SEM T2/T0 %
ISP794 ISP794, rsbU 7.82×10+7 2.01×10+7 255 79 3.26×10−6 1003
AR1079 ISP794, yjbH(K23stop) eryr nearby 6.98×10+7 1.95×10+7 895 201 1.28×10−5 394
AR774 ISP794, vraS(G45R) kan r nearby 1.25×10+7 2.24×10+6 >10002 8.00×10−5 >1000
AR826 ISP794, stp1(Q12stop) kanr nearby 2.80×10+7 5.73×10+6 >10002 3.50×10−5 >1000
1

Frequency of emergence expressed as the ratio of colony forming units (CFU) under selective (Teicoplanin 2 µg/ml) and non-selective conditions (No teicoplanin). Colony forming units were counted at 48 h, 37°C.

2

Viable counts on agar containing 2 µg/ml of teicoplanin were too high to accurately measure using these conditions. More than 1000 CFU were estimated in each experiment.

3

The effect of rsbU + on glycopeptide emergence is discussed in Galbusera et al [(30)]. ISP794 emergence frequency was set equal to 100% for normalization and comparison.

4

The emergence frequency was set equal to 100% for normalization and comparison with its derivative Δspx.