Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 27.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Inf Model. 2011 May 25;51(6):1296–1306. doi: 10.1021/ci2000665

Table 7.

Comparison of R2 and RMSD between LISA and other scoring functions for the Muegge and Martin's test set

correlation (R2)

No. set no. of complexes LISA ITScore/SE20 ITScore19 PMF9912 DrugScore15 BLEEP52 SMoG0116 SCORE131 SMOG53
1 serine protease 16 0.91 0.89 0.87 0.87 0.86 0.79 0.81 0.76 0.76
2 metalloprotease 15 0.93 0.71 0.71 0.58 0.70 0.59 0.64 0.41 0.58
3 L-arabinose binding protein 18 0.43 0.48 0.49 0.48 0.22 0.14 0.06 0.00 0.04
4 endothiapepsin 11 0.33 0.36 0.35 0.22 0.30 0.04 0.03 0.39 0.05
5 others 17 0.83 0.8 0.7 0.69 0.43 0.49 0.50 0.53 0.25
6 sets 1–5 77 0.68 0.76 0.65 0.61 n/a 0.28 0.46 0.30 0.21
RMSD

No. set no. of complexes LISA ITScore/SE20 ITScore19 PMF9912 DrugScore15 BLEEP52 SMoG0116 SCORE131 SMOG53
1 serine protease 16 0.97 n/a n/a 0.96 0.95 n/a 1.09 1.39 1.34
2 metalloprotease 15 0.89 n/a n/a 2.31 1.53 n/a 1.62 3.27 2.29
3 L-arabinose binding protein 18 1.87 n/a n/a 0.86 0.75 n/a 0.8 69.7 4.06
4 endothiapepsin 11 1.81 n/a n/a 1.89 0.94 n/a 1 1.26 4.18
5 others 17 1.66 n/a n/a 1.56 1.85 n/a 1.63 2.21 4.05
6 sets 1–5 77 1.42 n/a n/a 1.84 n/a n/a 1.69 3.47 4.43