Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 27.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Inf Model. 2011 May 25;51(6):1296–1306. doi: 10.1021/ci2000665

Table 8.

Comparison of r, SD and ME from LISA and other scoring functions to the work of Wang et al.

Scoring Functions r SD ME
LISA 0.610 1.92 1.47
X-Score::HPScore 0.514 1.89 1.47
X-Score::HMScore 0.566 1.82 1.42
X-Score::HSScore 0.506 1.90 1.48
DrugScore::Pair 0.473 1.94 1.51
DrugScore::Surf 0.463 1.95 1.53
DrugScore::Pair/Surf 0.476 1.94 1.50
Sybyl::D-Score 0.322 2.09 1.67
Sybyl::PMF-Score 0.147 2.16 1.74
Sybyl::G-Score 0.443 1.98 1.56
Sybyl::ChemScore 0.499 1.91 1.50
Sybyl::F-Score 0.141 2.19 1.77
Cerius2::LigScore 0.406 2.00 1.57
Cerius2::PLP1 0.458 1.96 1.52
Cerius2::PLP2 0.455 1.96 1.53
Cerius2::PMF 0.253 2.13 1.71
Cerius2::LUDI1 0.334 2.08 1.66
Cerius2::LUDI2 0.379 2.04 1.62
Cerius2::LUDI3 0.331 2.08 1.67
GOLD::GoldScore 0.285 2.16 1.72
GOLD::GoldScore_opt 0.365 2.06 1.63
GOLD::ChemScore 0.423 2.00 1.56
GOLD::ChemScore_opt 0.449 1.96 1.52
HINT 0.330 2.08 1.65