Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Microbiol. 2011 Jun 9;81(1):69–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07679.x

Table 2.

The effect of σW on membrane composition and fluidity

Strain W168 PfabHaF- fabHa(P5)fabF Pxyl-sigW PfabHaF- fabHa(P5*)fabF Pxyl-sigW fabHa::MLS fabHb::kan Pxyl-fabF fabHa::MLS Pxyl-fabF
% C15:0 iso a 9.6 ± 0.6 6.5 ± 0.8 10.7 ± 1.4 1.8 ± 0.8 15.6 ± 0.3 6.5 ± 0.9 1.9 ± 0.2
% C15:0 anteiso a 40.0 ± 3.1 31.8 ± 3.2 42.2 ± 2.4 30.3 ± 1.9 39.0 ± 2.8 32.4 ± 3.1 30.0 ± 2.7
% C16:0 iso a 3.6 ± 0.4 2.3 ± 0.5 1.7 ± 0.5 5.2 ± 0.4 4.8 ± 0.8 3.5 ± 1.1 4.3 ± 0.4
% C16:0 a 8.3 ± 1.6 8.3 ± 0.5 7.5 ± 1.1 22.2 ± 1.8 6.8 ± 1.2 8.5 ± 1.6 16.8 ± 1.2
% C17:0 iso a 10.3 ± 2.0 9.0 ± 1.7 8.1 ± 0.7 4.8 ± 0.7 10.6 ± 2.2 11.9 ± 2.4 5.4 ± 1.0
% C17:0 anteiso a 26.0 ± 1.8 32.5 ± 0.8 24.8 ± 2.1 27.7 ± 0.7 20.3 ± 0.4 34.0 ± 2.0 35.4 ± 2.2
% C18:0 a 2.2 ± 0.6 9.6 ± 1.0 2.8 ± 0.8 7.8 ± 1.1 2.0 ± 0.7 3.3 ± 0.4 6.0 ± 0.9
% straight FAs a 10.5 ± 1.0 17.9 ± 1.2 10.3 ± 1.1 29.3 ± 0.7 8.8 ± 1.0 11.8 ± 1.8 22.0 ± 0.7
% iso FAs a 23.5 ± 2.9 17.8 ± 2.9 20.6 ± 1.6 11.4 ± 1.1 31.0 ± 2.0 21.9 ± 3.9 12.0 ± 1.3
% anteiso FAs a 66.0 ± 3.5 64.3 ± 3.9 67.0 ± 2.1 58.0 ± 1.5 59.3 ± 2.5 66.4 ± 4.0 65.7 ± 0.9
17:15 FA ratio a 0.73 ± 0.07 1.08 ± 0.09 0.62 ± 0.08 1.03 ± 0.11 0.57 ± 0.08 1.18 ± 0.12 1.32 ± 0.22
Fluorescence anisotropy analysisb 0.185 ± 0.005 0.217 ± 0.003 0.202 ± 0.004 ND ND ND ND
a

Data derived from FAME analysis of the following strains under xylose inducing conditions: W168, PfabHaF-fabHa(P5)fabF Pxyl-sigW (HB13121), PfabHaF-fabHa(P5*)fabF Pxyl-sigW (HB13122) fabHa::MLS (HB13127), fabHb::kan (HB13115), Pxyl-fabF (HB13128), and fabHa::MLS Pxyl-fabF (HB13132). Data is presented as the average of three trials (± standard error).

b

Data derived from fluorescence anisotropy analysis of the wild type (W168), PfabHaF-fabHa(P5)fabF amyE::Pxyl-sigW (HB13121), and PfabHaF-fabHa(P5*)fabF amyE::Pxyl-sigW (HB13122) strains under xylose inducing conditions. Data is presented as the average of three trials (± standard error). Student’s t-tests were performed, and all three values were found to be statistically different (P value ≤ 0.05) from each other.