Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Body Image. 2011 May 10;8(3):297–300. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2011.03.002

Table 1.

Descriptive characteristics of the currently pregnant and nonpregnant sample (n = 995)a

Pregnant Participants
(n = 68)b
Nonpregnant Participants
(n = 927)b
N % N % Effect size
(Cramer’s
Phi)c
p-value
Age cohort
  Younger (mean age = 23.0) 24 35.4 268 28.9 .04 .256
  Older (mean age = 26.2) 44 64.6 659 71.1
Race
  White 26 38.6 457 50.0 .101
  African American 15 22.6 170 18.6
  Asian 21 30.8 167 18.3 .10
  Hispanic 3 4.4 46 5.0
  Native American 1 2.1 31 3.4
  Mixed/Other 1 1.5 44 4.8
Socio-economic Status
  Low 27 40.8 138 15.5 < .001
  Lower middle 9 14.1 162 18.1
  Middle 16 23.6 250 28.1 .18
  High middle 12 18.0 207 23.3
  High 2 3.6 134 15.1
Relationship Status
  Single/Casually dating 3 5.0 304 33.0 < .001
  Committed relationship, but not married 30 45.3 430 46.6 .22
  Married 28 43.3 180 19.5
  Separated or divorced 4 6.3 8 0.9
Other children
  None 30 44.1 655 71.0 .15 < .001
  One or more 38 55.9 267 29.0
a

The analysis sample of n = 995 excludes 88 (from the total 1083) women. This includes 13 who did not respond to the pregnancy question, 27 women who identified as breastfeeding, and 48 who, at the previous EAT survey 5 years earlier, were pregnant or breastfeeding or missing responses on these variables.

b

Total ns vary slightly within characteristics due to missing responses.

c

Cramer’s Phi is an effect size measure for contingency tables and is equal to the square root of the Chi-square statistic divided by n. Values between .10–.30 are considered small, .30–.50 moderate and >0.50 large.