Skip to main content
editorial
. 2011 Jun 15;3(6):79–98. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v3.i6.79

Table 3.

Polymorphisms of matrix metalloproteinases in hepatocellular carcinoma

Gene SNP Reference Cancer type Ethnicity Case/control Outcome parameter Results Parameter OR OR 95% CI P value
MMP-1 -1607 1G/2G Matsumura[65] Gastric Japanese 215/166 Cancer risk No difference in cancer risk
Clinicopathol. par. No correlation with any clinicopath. par.
Jin[42] GCA Chinese 183/350 Cancer risk No difference in cancer risk
LN metastases No difference in LN metastases
MMP-2 -1306 C/T Zhang[53] Gastric Chinese 228/774 Cancer risk Increased cancer risk in CC CC vs CT/TT 1.67 1.17-2.38
Wu[55] Gastric Taiwanese 240/283 Cancer risk No difference in cancer risk
LN metastases Increased risk of lymphatic invasion in CC CC vs CT+TT 2.77 1.27-6.04 0.01
Venous invasion Increased risk of venous invasion in CC CC vs CT+TT 2.93 1.27-6.78 0.012
Survival No difference in survival
Kubben[14] Gastric Caucasian 79/169 Cancer risk No difference in cancer risk
Tumor-related survival No difference in tumor-related survival
Alakus[56] Gastric Caucasian 135/58 Cancer risk No difference in cancer risk
MMP-2 protein expression No correlation with protein expression
Overall survival No difference in overall survival
Li[39] GCA Chinese 257/624 Cancer risk No difference in cancer risk
Miao[54] GCA Chinese 356/789 Cancer risk Increased cancer risk in CC CC vs CT+TT 3.36 2.34-4.97
Distant metastases No difference in metastases
MMP-2 -735 C/T Li[39] GCA Chinese 257/624 Cancer risk Trend towards increased cancer risk in CC CC vs CT+TT 1.36 0.99-1.87 0.06
Cancer risk in non-smoker Increased cancer risk in CC in non-smoker CC vs CT+TT 1.7 1.07-2.68 0.02
MMP-3 -1171 6A/5A Zhang[44] GCA Chinese 183/350 Cancer risk No difference in cancer risk
Cancer risk in smoker No difference in cancer risk in smoker
LN metastases No difference in LN metastases
Infiltration depth No difference in infiltration depth
MMP-8 -799 C/T Kubben[14] Gastric Caucasian 79/169 Cancer risk No difference in cancer risk
Tumor-related survival No difference in tumor-related survival
MMP-7 -181 A/G Sugimoto[63] Gastric Japanese 160/434 Cancer risk Increased cancer risk in G-allele carriers AG+GG vs AA 2.32 1.24-4.35 0.009
Cancer stage Increased cancer stage in G allele carriers AG+GG vs AA 3.66 1.54-8.73 0.003
Kubben[14] Gastric Caucasian 79/169 Cancer risk More AA and less AG in cancer group AG+GG vs AA 0.50 0.28-0.87 < 0.04
Tumor-related survival No difference in tumor-related survival
Li[64] Gastric Chinese 338/380 Cancer risk Increased cancer risk in G allele carriers AG+GG vs AA 1.95 1.24-3.05 0.004
LN metastases Increased risk of LN metastases in G allele AG+GG vs AA 0.040
Cancer stage More advanced cancer stage in G allele AG+GG vs AA 0.007
Alakus[56] Gastric Caucasian 135/58 Cancer risk No difference in cancer risk AG+GG vs AA 1.06 0.69-1.64 0.79
Overall survival No difference in overall survival
Zhang[45] GCA Chinese 201/350 Cancer risk Increased cancer risk in G allele carriers AG+GG vs AA 1.96 1.17-3.29
LN metastases No difference in LN metastases
MMP-7 -153 C/T Kubben[14] Gastric Caucasian 79/169 Cancer risk No difference in cancer risk
Tumor-related survival No difference in tumor-related survival
MMP-8 17 C/G Kubben[14] Gastric Caucasian 79/169 Cancer risk No difference in cancer risk
Tumor-related survival No difference in tumor-related survival
MMP-9 R279Q Tang[59] Gastric Chinese 74/100 Cancer risk No difference in cancer risk
LN metastases Increased risk of LN metastases in RR RR vs QQ+RQ 5.74 1.59-13.43
MMP-9 P574R Tang[59] Gastric Chinese 74/100 Cancer risk No difference in cancer risk
LN metastases Increased risk of LN metastases in PP PP vs RR+PR 4.17 1.39-11.78
MMP-9 -1562 C/T Kubben[14] Gastric Caucasian 79/169 Cancer risk No difference in cancer risk
Tumor-related survival No difference in tumor-related survival
Matsumura[57] Gastric Japanese 177/224 Cancer risk No difference in cancer risk
Infiltration depth Deeper submucosal infiltration in T allele CT+TT vs CC 2.61 1.07-6.34 0.034
Lymphatic invasion Increased lymphatic invasion in T allele CT+TT vs CC 2.27 1.09-4.74 0.028
TNM classification More advanced stage cancer in T allele CT+TT vs CC 2.26 1.12-4.55 0.022
Venous invasion No difference in venous invasion CT+TT vs CC 1.98 0.99-3.97 0.053
Zhang[53] Gastric Chinese 228/774 Cancer risk No difference in cancer risk
Wu[58] Gastric Taiwanese 263/354 Cancer risk No difference in cancer risk
MMP-12 -82 A/G Li[39] GCA Chinese 335/624 Cancer risk No difference in cancer risk
Cancer risk in smoker No difference in cancer risk in smoker
MMP-13 -77 A/G Li[39] GCA Chinese 257/624 Cancer risk No difference in cancer risk
Cancer risk in smoker Decreased cancer risk in AG in smoker AG vs AA/AG 0.47 0.28-0.8 0.01
Zhang[41] GCA Chinese 243/609 Cancer risk No difference in cancer risk
Cancer risk in smoker Decreased cancer risk in AG in smoker
TIMP-1 372 C/T Kubben[14] Gastric Caucasian 79/169 Cancer risk No difference in cancer risk
Tumor-related survival No difference in tumor-related survival
TIMP-2 -418 G/C Kubben[14] Gastric Caucasian 79/169 Cancer risk No difference in cancer risk
Tumor-related survival No difference in tumor-related survival
Wu[55] Gastric Taiwanese 240/283 Cancer risk No difference in cancer risk
LN metastases Increased risk of LN metastases in GG GG vs CG+GG 2.87 1.22-6.76 0.16
Venous invasion Increased venous invasion in GG GG vs CG+GG 2.65 1.08-6.49 0.033
Survival No difference in survival
Yang[66] Gastric China 206/206 Cancer risk More C-alleles in cancer patients CC+CG vs GG 1.51 1.00-2.26 0.049
Clinicopathol. par. No correlation with any clinicopath. par.
TIMP-2 303 C/T Kubben[14] Gastric Caucasian 79/169 Cancer risk No difference in cancer risk
Tumor-related survival Better survival in CC patients CC vs CT/TT 4.45 1.81-10.9 0.001
Alakus[56] Gastric Caucasian 135/58 Cancer risk No difference in cancer risk
LN metastases More LN metastases in CC 0.01
Distant metastases Increased risk of distant metastases in CC 0.022
Survival No difference in survival

SNP: Single nucleotide polymorphism; GCA: Gastric Cardia Adenocarcinoma; LN: Lymph node; OR: Odds ratio; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; Clinicopath. par.: Clinicopathological parameters. 1Except histological subtype.