Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Jul;128(1):208–220. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318218fc51

Table 5.

Comparison of responsiveness of the Brief MHQ score and objective function measures, controlling for disease type.*††

Baseline value Follow-up value p value SRM
Brief MHQ Score 58.8 ± 14.4 70.5 ± 11.5 0.001 4.15
Original MHQ Score 59.7 ± 13.6 70.9 ± 10.2 0.001 3.30
Grip Strength (kg) 10.7 ± 3.3 11.6 ± 5.7 0.001 0.36
Pinch Strength (kg) 5.3 ± 1.7 14.1 ± 3.75 0.001 1.60
Jebsen-Taylor Test score (sec) 40.6 ± 8.57 44.2 ± 11.45 0.001 1.26
*

Cell values are mean ±SD.

Paired t-test comparing follow up scores and baseline scores.

Standardized Response Mean is calculated using the following formula: (follow-up mean − baseline mean)/standard deviation of the change

††

Excluding patients with carpal tunnel syndrome, and RA patients who did not undergo SMPA arthroplasty. Patients who did not have both baseline and follow-up measurements were also excluded from analysis