Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Adolesc Health. 2011 Mar 12;49(1):47–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.10.006

Table 3.

Frequencies, unadjusted and adjusted odds in individual change of physical examination report among each sexual behavior category by gender

Sexual behavior status category from baseline to follow-up % Individuals who Report Physical Exam at Baseline & Follow-Upa Unadjusted Odds Ratiob (95% CI) p-value Adjusted Odds Ratiob,c (95% CI) p-value
Yes No Only Baseline Only Follow-up
Male
Sexual initiator 45.1 22.0 14.5 18.4 1.27 (0.93–1.75) 0.134 1.27 (0.92–1.76) 0.143
Sexual behavior both times 47.9 21.2 15.8 15.1 0.96 (0.51–1.79) 0.889 0.96 (0.52–1.77) 0.889
Decline in report 39.4 24.3 12.7 23.7 2.42 (0.98–5.97) 0.054 2.69 (0.96–7.49) 0.059
No sexual behavior 45.5 22.1 12.6 19.8 1.57 (0.70–3.50) 0.270 1.57 (1.26–1.96) 0.000
Female
Sexual initiator 42.5 20.0 12.1 25.3 2.09 (1.67–2.62) 0.000 2.09 (1.66–2.64) 0.000
Sexual behavior both times 46.9 18.5 10.9 23.6 2.18 (1.49–3.19) 0.000 2.16 (1.51–3.09) 0.000
Decline in report 31.7 31.3 14.7 22.3 1.67 (0.61–4.56) 0.314 1.86 (0.56–6.20) 0.310
No sexual behavior 42.3 24.5 9.6 23.6 2.47 (2.00–3.04) 0.000 2.47 (2.00–3.04) 0.000

“Yes” indicates respondent reported an exam within the previous 12 months at both baseline and follow-up; “No” indicates respondent reported no exam within the previous 12 months at both baseline and follow-up.

a

Weighted, accounting for weight and strata

b

Logistic regression with random effects estimating individual odds of physical examination report at follow-up compared to baseline for individuals with each sexual behavior category, accounting for weight and strata

c

Adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, parent education, family welfare status, health insurance status and sports participation