Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jun 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Aug;36(4):892–905. doi: 10.1037/a0017173

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Evolution of Compatibility Effects (in ms) for each individual participant in short and long SOAs as function of training (in blocks) in Expts 1, 2, 3 & 4. Individual data is noisy (each point now represents RT in only 10 incompatible trials minus 10 compatible trials, except Expt. 4 where there were only 2 or 3 trials of each type in a block), but it appears that each participants’ data approximately follows the pattern of the mean (Figures 3 and 4), rather than making step transitions from absent to present priming. This is especially clear after the response reversal in Experiments 3 and 4, where the graded change in priming strength lasts several blocks.