Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar 21;91(2):340–349. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvr079

Table 1.

Heart rate (bpm) during in vivo study

Group Baseline Coronary occlusion Reperfusion
2 min 30 min 60 min 120 min
C57BL/6 mice
 CON 404 ± 12 411 ± 16 425 ± 18 413 ± 18 401 ± 21 391 ± 16
 HG 393 ± 16 403 ± 14 399 ± 13 417 ± 15 404 ± 25 423 ± 13
 IPC 418 ± 16 403 ± 14 414 ± 13 435 ± 12 394 ± 20 382 ± 15
 IPC+HG 389 ± 26 412 ± 16 420 ± 12 408 ± 11 399 ± 16 408 ± 18
 IPC + HOsm 422 ± 18 397 ± 19 401 ± 21 407 ± 27 395 ± 26 411 ± 26
WT littermate mice
 CON 403 ± 14 414 ± 14 432 ± 15 421 ± 12 412 ± 15 408 ± 16
l-NAME 391 ± 11 389 ± 12 413 ± 15 401 ± 12 398 ± 12 390 ± 11
 IPC 418 ± 20 408 ± 16 418 ± 15 419 ± 15 402 ± 18 396 ± 16
 IPC + l-NAME 413 ± 11 393 ± 12 404 ± 12 406 ± 13 412 ± 13 419 ± 13
 IPC+HG 381 ± 13 390 ± 13 402 ± 12 410 ± 15 415 ± 13 399 ± 17
 IPC+HG+l-NAME 399 ± 12 383 ± 12 384 ± 9 374 ± 10 377 ± 14 390 ± 13
Transgenic GTP cyclohydrolase 1 mice
 CON 391 ± 12 402 ± 12 415 ± 14 432 ± 15 427 ± 19 428 ± 20
l-NAME 395 ± 10 409 ± 19 412 ± 17 42- ± 16 413 ± 15 412 ± 17
 IPC 393 ± 11 394 ± 13 405 ± 12 414 ± 14 391 ± 14 385 ± 15
 IPC + l-NAME 393 ± 15 403 ± 11 401 ± 12 409 ± 15 419 ± 20 417 ± 16
 IPC + HG 379 ± 22 424 ± 12 439 ± 17 431 ± 13 397 ± 18 398 ± 16
 IPC + HG + l-NAME 409 ± 11 387 ± 17 418 ± 9 421 ± 10 414 ± 10 421 ± 10

All animals were subjected to 30 min of coronary occlusion followed by 2 h of reperfusion [control (CON)]. IPC was induced by four cycles of 5 min of coronary occlusion/5 min of reperfusion in the presence or absence of HG or hyperosmolarity (HOsm), as described in Figure 1A and B. There were no statistically significant difference among groups (n = 6–9 mice/group).