Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 28;6(6):e21644. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021644

Table 2. Assignment of end-reads and corresponding fosmids from the mother Tcr metagenome at different taxonomical levels.

Level of assignment Assignment details No. of reads (percentage of total reads: 544) No. of fosmids (percentage of total fosmids: 272)
Kingdom Reads/fosmids of which at least one end-read was assigned within Bacteria. 365 (67.1%) 226 (83.1%)
Phylum Reads/fosmids of which at least one end-read was assigned within Bacteroidetes. 27 (5.0%) 22 (8.1%)
Reads/fosmids of which at least one end-read was assigned within Firmicutes. 254 (46.7%) 180 (66.2%)
Order Reads/fosmids of which at least one end-read was assigned within Bacteroidales. 20 (3.7%) 19 (7.0%)
Reads/fosmids of which at least one end-read was assigned within Clostridales. 182 (33.4%) 139 (51.1%)
Family Reads/fosmids of which at least one end-read was assigned within Bacteroidaceae. 9 (1.7%) 9 (3.3%)
Reads/fosmids of which at least one end-read was assigned within Lachnospiraceae. 35 (6.4%) 29 (10.7%)
Reads/fosmids of which at least one end-read was assigned within Clostridiaceae. 9 (1.7%) 9 (3.3%)
Reads/fosmids of which at least one end-read were assigned within Eubacteriaceae. 1 (0.2%) 1 (0.4%)
Reads/fosmids of which at least one end-read was assigned within Ruminococcaceae. 10 (1.8%) 10 (3.7%)
Genus Reads/fosmids of which at least one end-read was assigned within Bacteroides. 9 (1.7%) 9 (3.3%)
Reads/fosmids of which at least one end-read was assigned within Dorea. 16 (2.9%) 12 (4.4%)
Reads/fosmids of which at least one end-read was assigned within Clostridium. 9 (1.7%) 9 (3.3%)
Reads/fosmids of which at least one end-read was assigned within Eubacterium. 1 (0.2%) 1 (0.4%)
Reads/fosmids of which at least one end-read was assigned within Ruminococcus. 8 (1.5%) 8 (2.9%)
Reads/fosmids of which at least one end-read was assigned within Faecalibacterium. 2 (0.4%) 2 (0.7%)
“No hit & removed MGE hits” Both forward and reverse fosmid end-reads in “No hit & removed MGE hits” 92 (16.9%) 46 (16.9%)
Both forward and reverse fosmid end-reads with no blastx hits or hits below min cut off (0.15 bit score/length). 76 (13.9%) 38 (13.9%)
Both forward and reverse fosmid end-reads with no blastx hits. 54 (9.9%) 27 (9.9%)