Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Optom Vis Sci. 2011 Jul;88(7):830–836. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182192658

Table 5.

Comparison of sensitivity of detecting hierarchical & four targeted conditions.

Sensitivity 90% Specificity
94% Specificity
Palm-AR Retino-max Difference (95% C.I.) p-value Palm-AR Retino-max Difference (95% C.I.) p-value
Conditions by Severity
 Overall* (n=65) 0.74 0.78 0.05 (−0.07, 0.16) 0.58 0.66 0.66 0.00 (−0.11, 0.11) 1.00
 Group 1 (n=28) 0.79 0.93 0.14 (−0.01, 0.31) 0.13 0.71 0.82 0.11 (−0.06, 0.28) 0.38
 Group 2 (n=22) 0.77 0.64 −0.14 (−0.33, 0.07) 0.38 0.64 0.50 −0.14 (−0.32, 0.07) 0.38
 Group 3 (n=15) 0.60 0.73 0.13 (−0.14, 0.38) 0.63 0.60 0.60 0.00 (−0.21, 0.21) 1.00

Type of Condition
 Amblyopia (n=24) 0.75 0.88 0.13 (−0.04, 0.30) 0.25 0.67 0.83 0.17 (−0.01, 0.34) 0.13
 Strabismus (n=10) 0.70 0.70 0.00 (−0.20, 0.20) 1.00 0.60 0.60 0.00 (−0.18, 0.18) 1.00
 Refractive error (n=55) 0.84 0.84 0.00 (−0.12, 0.12) 1.00 0.76 0.75 −0.02 (−0.14, 0.11) 1.00
 Reduced VA (n=10) 0.30 0.70 0.40 (−0.04, 0.68) 0.22 0.30 0.30 0.00 (−0.36, 0.36) 1.00
*

Includes the presence of any GSE targeted condition

From Exact McNemar test