Table 5.
Results of hierarchical multiple regression analysis for insult detection task response error data for Experiment 4.
Variable | B | SEB | β | sr | R2 | ΔR2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Step 1 (control variables) | 0.271*** | |||||
Step 2 | 0.292*** | 0.022* | ||||
Control variables | ||||||
Printed length | 0.66 | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.17* | ||
Morphological complexity | −0.41 | 0.97 | −0.04 | −0.03 | ||
HAL log-frequency | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.06 | ||
Frequency ratings | −0.53 | 0.48 | −0.10 | −0.08 | ||
Number of meanings | −3.24 | 3.00 | −0.09 | −0.07 | ||
Offensiveness ratings | −2.89 | 0.56 | −0.41 | −0.36*** | ||
Imageability ratings | 1.68 | 0.50 | 0.28 | 0.23** | ||
Bodily experience ratings | −0.73 | 0.34 | −0.18 | −0.15* |
Note. HAL, hyperspace analog to language. The B, SEB, β, and sr values are for the final step in the analysis, where all the predictor variables were included in the equation. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001