Table 6.
Results of hierarchical multiple regression analysis for insult detection task word recall data for Experiment 4.
| Variable | B | SEB | β | sr | R2 | ΔR2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step 1 (control variables) | 0.174** | |||||
| Step 2 | 0.220** | 0.046* | ||||
| Control variables | ||||||
| Printed length | −0.54 | 0.48 | −0.13 | −0.08 | ||
| Morphological complexity | 1.55 | 1.77 | 0.10 | 0.06 | ||
| HAL log-frequency | 0.06 | 0.21 | 0.02 | 0.02 | ||
| Frequency ratings | 3.56 | 0.88 | 0.38 | 0.29** | ||
| Number of meanings | −2.05 | 5.49 | −0.03 | −0.03 | ||
| Offensiveness ratings | 0.73 | 1.02 | 0.06 | 0.05 | ||
| Imageability ratings | 1.31 | 0.92 | 0.13 | 0.10 | ||
| Bodily experience ratings | 1.86 | 0.62 | 0.26 | 0.22* |
Note. HAL, hyperspace analog to language. The B, SEB, β, and sr values are for the final step in the analysis, where all the predictor variables were included in the equation. *p < 0.01, **p < 0.001