Table 4.
Author | Description | Regimen | Number of patients | Response rate (%) | Partial response (%) | Stable disease (%) | Median PFS (months) | Median OS (months) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Varker et al. [2007] | Previously treated | Bevacizumab | 16 | 3 | 8.5 | |||
Bevacizumab and IFN | 16 | 3 | 10 | |||||
González-Cao et al. [2008] | Previously treated | Bevacizumab and weekly paclitaxel | 12 | 17 | 17 | 58 | 3.7 | 7.8 |
Perez et al. [2009] | Previously treated | Bevacizumab and weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin | 53 | 17 | 17 | 57 | 6 | 12 |
Peyton et al. [2009] | Previously treated | Bevacizumab and everolimus | 28 | 4 | 4 | 68 | 3.5 | |
Si et al. [2009] | Previously treated acral | Bevacizumab and temozolomide and sorafenib | 11 | 18 | 18 | 54.5 | ||
Wyman et al. [2007] | First line and Previously treated | Bevacizumab and erlotinib | 29 | 9 | 9 | 22 | 3.2 | |
Munzone et al. [2007] | First line | Bevacizumab and dacarbazine | 8 | 20 | 20 | 40 | ||
Boasberg et al. [2009] | First line | Bevacizumab and nab-paclitaxel | 41 | 6.25 | 91% (6 months) | |||
83% (12 months) | ||||||||
O’Day et al. [2009] | First line | Bevacizumab and paclitaxel and carboplatin | 143 | 25.5 | 23.4 | 50.4 | 5.6 | 12.3 |
Paclitaxel and carboplatin | 71 | 16.4 | 14.9 | 37.4 | 4.2 | 8.6 |
IFN, interferon; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival.