Table 1.
Abdominal segmentation defects in embryos from various mutant females
|
|
|
No. of abdominal segments
|
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
||
| pum | Msc/680 | 4 | 46 | 39 | 10 | 2 | |||
| fs1/Df(2L)TE37C-7 | 13 | 52 | 30 | 4 | 1 | ||||
| fs3/Df(2L)TE37C-7 | 4 | 28 | 28 | 24 | 11 | 4 | |||
| fs1/fs3 | 2 | 45 | 34 | 17 | 3 | ||||
| brat | 1/fs3 | 3 | 11 | 42 | 24 | 8 | 13 | ||
| k06028/fs3 | 18 | 30 | 25 | 27 | |||||
| k06028/k06028a | 7 | 29 | 63 | ||||||
| +/fs3 | 100 | ||||||||
| +/Df(2L)TE37C-7 | 100 | ||||||||
Each entry is the percentage of embryos derived from females of the indicated genotype (left) bearing the indicated number of abdominal segments (above). Forty to one-hundred embryos were scored in each case.
a
Germ-line clone.