Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Aging. 2011 Mar 24;33(3):619.e1–619.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.02.004

Table 3a.

Cognitive performance descriptives and Generalized Estimating Equations results for sons and daughters of LLFS probands or their sibling and their spouse’s controls

Cognitive test group N Mean 95%CI B 95% CI p-value
Logical Memory IA LLFS Offspring
spouses-controls
305 13.19 12.7, 13.7 0.13 −0.56, 0.81 0.718
434 13.03 12.6, 13.5
Logical Memory IIA LLFS Offspring
spouses-controls
305 11.76 11.3, 12.2 0.30 −0.39, 0.99 0.391
434 11.47 11.0, 11.9
Digit Forward LLFS Offspring
spouses-controls
305 8.55 8.3, 8.8 0.66 0.37, 0.96 1.E-05
434 7.83 7.6, 8.1
Digit Backward LLFS Offspring
spouses-controls
305 6.76 6.5, 7.0 0.59 0.26, 0.91 4.E-04
434 6.17 6.0, 6.4
Category Fluency
Animals
LLFS Offspring
spouses-controls
305 22.08 21.4, 22.8 −0.31 −1.21, 0.59 0.497
434 22.32 21.8, 22.9
Category Fluency
Vegetables
LLFS Offspring
spouses-controls
305 15.52 15.0, 16.1 0.90 0.24, 1.56 8.E-03
434 14.65 14.3, 15.0