Table 1.
Occurrence of Cryptosporidium and Giardia spp. in source and tap water samples in Shanghai, China
Water sample and detection technique |
Cryptosporidium |
Giardia |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Filtration |
CCF |
Filtration |
CCF |
|||||
Detectiona | Intensity (mean ± SD)b | Detection | Intensity (mean ± SD) | Detection | Intensity (mean ± SD) | Detection | Intensity (mean ± SD) | |
Source water | ||||||||
Microscopy | 16/50c | 5.2 ± 6.5 | 11/50c | 4.5 ± 4.3 | 9/50d | 3.8 ± 2.1 | 5/50d | 2.2 ± 0.5 |
PCR | 6/50 | 1.8 ± 0.8 | 14/50 | 2.1 ± 1.2 | NDe | ND | ||
Tap water and microscopy | 2/30 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | ND | 0 | ND |
Number of samples positive for Cryptosporidium or Giardia/number of samples analyzed.
For microscopy, the intensity is the calculated concentration of Cryptosporidium oocysts or Giardia cysts for 10 liters of water is shown. For PCR, the intensity is the number of PCR-positive replicates/5 replicates for all positive samples.
Eight samples were positive for Cryptosporidium by both methods.
No sample was positive for Giardia by both methods.
ND, not done.